Notes: New Directions in the Economic Analysis of Education @ mfi uchicago
Rough notes on Day One of “New Directions in the Economic Analysis of Education” event at the University of Chicago’s Milton Friedman Institute. Hopefully I’ll get a chance to write some reflections about this…
9:02:13 AM: I’m randomly attending an economics of education event at #mfi uchicago today. I’m under the impression that it will be…
9:02:55 AM: …less about education in the traditional sense and more about human capital development. there’s a reason econ is the dismal science #mfi
9:06:29 AM: tentatively planning on sitting in on a few sessions today. I’ll twitter along haphazardly…
9:07:30 AM: #mfi co-sponsor is the “Center for Human Capital at SUNY Buffalo”
9:08:35 AM: #mfi uchicago: program for New Directions in Economic Analysis…
http://mfi.uchicago.edu/programs/fy10_events/20091120_becker.shtml
9:14:53 AM: Session 1: Education & Health –> is there a causal effect of education on health? + models on the rate of return of education #mfi uchicago
9:15:48 AM: “schooling” in this talk refers to “some college” #mfi uchicago
9:23:26 AM: “partial inventory of the stock of health at age T… edu can promote health, health + education can improve many factors” #mfi uchicago
9:25:08 AM: Blogged — Notes: New Directions in the Economic Analysis of Education @ mfi uchicago: Some Related Posts:
No rel… http://bit.ly/2ILcD1
9:28:39 AM: (I should really share some of the equations but am lazy)
9:33:54 AM: nice bit about measuring the impact of shifts in policy, probabilisticly. #mfi uchicago
9:33:54 AM: nice bit about measuring the impact of shifts in policy, probabilisticly. #mfi uchicago
9:37:26 AM: nice attempt to identify the marginal limits (for the marginal person). different limits depending on approach to equation… #mfi uchicago
9:39:48 AM: I like how Gary Becker doesn’t wait for the question & answer part of the session! #mfi uchicago
9:42:31 AM: “how does this look in a developing country?”
9:44:31 AM: presenter is running out of time. trying to cram 30+ minutes into his last 10…
9:45:05 AM: “only talking about marginal returns on wages right now”
9:49:39 AM: side note: the diminishing returns property is something that I like to apply to all sorts of things. The most useful of economics ideas
9:50:15 AM: “How much time do I have left? 5 Minutes. 5 minutes? I haven’t even gotten to health yet!” (the title is health and education) #mfi uchicago
9:55:51 AM: “going to college seems to make a difference when it comes to smoking, but not so much for being overweight” #mfi uchicago
10:03:30 AM: ~ “no clear argument for education subsidization based on health effects” #mfi uchicago
10:04:45 AM: discussant, starting with econometric concepts… #mfi uchicago
10:18:28 AM: the discussant is very good… he’s taking parts of the paper apart in such a pleasant way #mfi uchicago
10:21:06 AM: “cigarettes have been called coffin nails since the 1940s, so it’s hard to say that people didn’t know” #mfi uchicago
10:23:59 AM: discussant: “sometimes it’s hard to find the conclusions in his papers, and when you do they are in very small print”
10:25:54 AM: “new papers are arguing that there is no effect on health from education”
10:54:42 AM: Session 2 is “Trends in Quality-Adjusted Skill Premia in the United States, 1960–2000 ” #mfi uchicago
10:57:27 AM: “is it an underlying assumption that the technology of education hasn’t changed substantially?” #mfi uchicago
10:58:52 AM: non committal answer to that, which means that the longitudinal nature of this might be undercut by innovation in teaching / training
11:10:26 AM: session two is struggle. first the crowd is more apt to hijack the session, two the tech in the room is being uncooperative. #mfi uchicago
11:16:41 AM: crowd “all migrations are not equal. different migrations mean different things” #mfi uchicago
11:38:41 AM: session 2 was interesting, discussant is up. #mfi uchicago
12:29:05 PM: was going to sit out sess 3, but now I’m taking the “let’s just sit here and get some of my email done” approach. Sess 4 is the important 1
12:46:23 PM: the presenter and discussant from session 1 are having a spirited discussion during the break. academia at it’s best. #mfi uchicago
1:02:19 PM: Session 3 ” Human Capital, Endogenous Information Acquisition, and “Home Bias” in Financial Markets ” #mfi uchicago
1:47:22 PM: #mfi uchicago Session 3 has one chart that mentions schooling attainments. (bring on session 4, pls)
1:52:49 PM: “more education increases your likelihood of holding foreign & domestic stocks” (they’ve controlled 4 general wealth somehow) #mfi uchicago
2:09:23 PM: academia: the discussants are very good, they give a much better summary than the presenters ever do.
2:12:17 PM: #mfi uchicago still in session 3, it’s tough not to look at buying local assets as a consequence of informational advantage.
2:20:18 PM: “countries with low education levels are more dependent on the US economy” #mfi uchicago
2:21:54 PM: Session 4: “Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: New Evidence from Boston’s Charters and Pilots” #mfi uchicago
2:33:16 PM: ah, charter schools… what should I say? I know plenty of good people who do very good work in charters, but…
2:38:41 PM: “can schools alone close large achievement gaps?”
2:39:42 PM: (i’d say no, schools alone can’t close large achievement gaps. this group would say yes, or maybe) #mfi uchicago
2:42:14 PM: “since 1992: 75 charters granted in Mass, 9 have been lost” #mfi uchicago
2:45:27 PM: “boston has pilot schools which are approved by the teachers union and have some additional flexiblity from the BPS rules” #mfi uchicago
2:48:16 PM: “boston charter middle schools have a 12 to 1 student:teacher ratio” / geez, that’s almost an over-determining factor in itself…
2:53:25 PM: “charters 1400 hrs/yr, 1100 hr/yr in regular BPS” / this one is another overwhelming factor, but one that I’m crediting charters for. /#mfi
2:55:21 PM: they’re trying to look at the lotteries (which I’ll always contend are stacked in the favor of charters) #mfi uchicago
2:58:34 PM: who starts charters? ~ “companies, individual educational entrepreneurs, dissatisfied teachers who still have idealism” #mfi uchicago
3:02:04 PM: “BPS enrolls more special ed students than charters or pilots, charters enroll many fewer limited english students” #mfi uchicago
3:03:31 PM: chicago, I believe, has a more drastic difference in the numbers of spec ed students in charters vs. regular cps #mfi uchicago
3:05:37 PM: they aren’t yet addressing the familial advantage inherent in applying for these lotteries. #charters #mfi uchicago
3:09:48 PM: as far as I’m concerned class size is #1 factor. Give any kid significant educational attention and you make a big difference.
3:14:56 PM: they’re looking at a comparison between lottery participants, comparing those that were accepted and those that weren’t. #mfi uchicago
3:17:20 PM: this almost covers the effects of the > parental interest in edu (where charters usually have a disproportionate advantage) #mfi uchicago
3:30:47 PM: “seems like the oversubscribed school are really the good ones, boston parents are trying to get into the good schools” #mfi uchicago
3:33:16 PM: “we’re all bayesians” #mfi uchicago
3:36:11 PM: discussant “if we were able to pay 10K more per student/year in charters, the rate of return would be outstanding” #mfi uchicago
3:43:13 PM: discussant bringing up chicago magnets and fact that the with-it parents get their kids into best magnet hs first (charters as fall back)
3:51:54 PM: “HCZ data is similar to boston data, but smaller scale and more complicating factors” #mfi uchicago
3:58:09 PM: only at the end did they talk about self-selection effects of parents who are “with it” enough to get their kids into a school lottery. #mfi
3:59:42 PM: the “with it” parents are an unappreciated part of this story. slight gains are going to be canceled out when that advantage goes #mfi
Popularity: 1%
3 Responses
to “Notes: New Directions in the Economic Analysis of Education @ mfi uchicago”
1 Trackback(s)
- Nov 22, 2009: Present Tensed / rasml.org







I agree with you — if the oversubscribed schools are the better ones, then we cannot only look at these schools. The lotteried-in students will arguably have achievement gains, but that does not necessarily mean all charter schools are improving achievement.…
Nothing about charter effects on segregation? :)
Hiya Wendy — Maybe we’ll finally get to catch up before thanksgiving! (sorry for being so tough to get a hold of)
No, nothing really about segregation. The Charter schools demographics in Boston were fairly similar to the general boston demographics. More african-americans, fewer hispanic-americans. Wasn’t presented as being statistically significant. Few special ed students, and few non-english speakers in the charter schools seemed to be more significant…